h-index: 6     i10-index: 4

Comparative Analysis of Physical Properties of Paddy Rice and Soybeans

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa campus (UFV), Viçosa - Minas Gerais, Brazil

Abstract
Understanding the physical properties of agricultural products is essential for optimizing their handling, processing, and storage methods. This study compared the physical characteristics of paddy rice and soybeans, emphasizing their implications for post-harvest management. Key findings indicate that paddy rice grains have greater sphericity, lower circularity, and a higher surface-to-volume ratio than soybeans. In addition, paddy rice has a smaller volume compared to soybeans, which affects its handling dynamics. The static angle of repose for paddy rice was significantly higher, suggesting improved stability during storage. Furthermore, density measurements showed that paddy rice has a density of approximately 1547 kg/m³, while soybeans measured around 1479 kg/m³. Both products exhibited similar porosity values, with paddy rice at 40.50% and soybeans at 39.0%.

Graphical Abstract

Comparative Analysis of Physical Properties of Paddy Rice and Soybeans

Keywords

Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Sami Publishing Company remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Sami Publishing Company 

  1. Ciscato CH, Souza GS, Barbosa CM, Gebara AB. Pesticide residues evaluation in brazilian basic diet: rice and bean. Pesticidas: Ecotoxicol. Meio Ambiente. 2012 Jan;22:1-6. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  2. Solanke G, Madan AK, Singh K, Kadam SM. Studies on physical properties of different corn (Zea mays ) varieties. J Dairying Foods Home Sci. 2022;71(1):1-10. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  3. Ahangarnezhad N, Najafi G, Jahanbakhshi A. Determination of the physical and mechanical properties of a potato (the Agria variety) in order to mechanise the harvesting and post-harvesting operations. Res Agr Eng. 2019;65(2):70-8. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  4. Mandala IG, Protonotariou SV. Physical properties of food materials. In: Engineering principles of unit operations in food processing. Woodhead Publishing; 2021. p. 45-64. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  5. Tran HM, Pham KT, Vo TM, Tonthat L, Huynh TT, Dao SV. Physical characteristics estimation for irregularly shaped fruit using two cameras. In: 2023 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP). 2023. p. 165-9. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  6. Pedrotti M, Xu L, Murray I, Tarantino A. Drying-induced volumetric behaviour of clays interpreted via binary pore-scale modelling. Computers Geotech. 2024;165:105911. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  7. Oliveira GH, Corrêa PC, Botelho FM, Vargas-Elías GA, Diniz MD. Analysis of thermodynamic properties of coffee berries during drying. In: XVII World Congress of the International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering; 2010. p. 1-8. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  8. Lee DJ, Xu X, Eifert J, Zhan P. Area and volume measurements of objects with irregular shapes using multiple silhouettes. Opt Eng. 2006;45(2):027202. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  9. Datta P, Faroughi SA. Angle of repose for superquadric particles: Investigating the effects of shape parameters. Computers Geotech. 2024;165:105918. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  10. Ebrahimi M. Porosity parameters in biomaterial science: Definition, impact, and challenges in tissue engineering. Front Mater Sci. 2021;15(3):352-73. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  11. Olasunkanmi A, Babatunde A, Tajudeen O, Babatunde A. A comparative study of physical properties of selected rice varieties in Nigeria. Foods Raw Mater. 2019;7(1):4-9. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  12. Sahu B, Khokhar D, Patel S, Mishra NK, Girish C. Some engineering properties of selected paddy varieties. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2018;6(2):1337-42. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  13. Jouki M, Khazaei N. Some physical properties of rice seed (Oryza sativa). Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2012;4(13):1846-9. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  14. Kumar K, Garg SK, Gupta DK. Moisture dependent physical properties of Bhatt (black soybean). Int J Processing Postharvest Technol. 2016;7(1):79-84. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  15. Park HS, Lee CM, Baek MK, Jeong OY, Kim SM. Application of a novel quantitative trait locus combination to improve grain shape without yield loss in rice (Oryza sativa L. spp. japonica). Plants. 2023;12(7):1513. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  16. Kakade A, Khodke S, Jadhav S, Gajabe M, Othzes N. Effect of moisture content on physical properties of soybean. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2019;8(4):1770-82. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  17. Bhadra R, Casada ME, Thompson SA, Boac JM, Maghirang RG, Montross MD, et al. Field-observed angles of repose for stored grain in the United States. Appl Eng Agric. 2017;33(1):131-7. [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
  18. Ge M, Chen G, Liu C, Zheng D, Liu W. Study of the pore structure characteristics of soybean grain piles using image processing technology. Int Agrophys. 2023;37(2):1-9. [Crossref], [Google Scholar], [Publisher]
Volume 6, Issue 4
Autumn 2024
Pages 201-209

  • Receive Date 26 November 2024
  • Revise Date 18 December 2024
  • Accept Date 22 December 2024